The questions leaders will be asked next, answered at length.

Working positions on AI adoption, decision intelligence and the investigations reshaping enterprise risk. Written to be used in a board paper, not skimmed.

6 positionsUpdated continuously

Detail of an executive workshop working through AI regulatory readiness

Regulation

AI regulation and enterprise readiness: POPIA, the EU AI Act and what boards must document

You do not need to predict the regulation. You need an inventory, a classification, an owner per system and a documented human review step. Everything else follows.

An accurate inventory is the highest-value compliance artefact. It answers the first question every regulator asks.
POPIA governs AI through purpose limitation and accountability, and section 71 gives rights where a decision is solely automated.

Read the position

Analyst examining forensic financial evidence during a reserves review

Assurance

Proof of Reserves explained: what it proves, what it does not, and how to review one

What Proof of Reserves actually demonstrates, the three gaps it cannot close, how zero-knowledge methods change the trade-off, and a checklist for reviewing a published proof.

4 min read

Investigators reviewing transaction evidence in a controlled environment

Digital-asset investigations

Crypto forensics for institutions: tracing digital-asset activity to a defensible standard

How institutions run digital-asset investigations that hold up: tracing method, attribution confidence, evidence handling and where on-chain analysis meets the regulated perimeter.

5 min read

Everything else in the library

Reading this because a decision is coming?

Bring us the decision rather than the technology question. The assessment identifies what has to be deployed, what evidence is missing and what your team needs in order to proceed.

Request an assessment

Discreet by default. No matter is too early to discuss.